A 60-day engagement that measures whether you can actually produce and present the evidence the EU AI Act requires for high-risk systems — and ends with a signed, independently verifiable Evidence Readiness Report.
For high-risk AI systems, the EU AI Act expects tamper-evident records that exist at the moment of each decision — not a document assembled after an incident. Most teams have controls; few can prove them on demand. This pilot finds the gap before an examiner does.
Automatic, traceable logs over the system lifetime — period of use, inputs, reference data, verifiers — retained for the required period.
Declared accuracy, resilience to faults, and resistance to manipulation of use or behaviour — each backed by evidence.
A living description binding every control to the module that implements it and the version that produced each output.
Evidence collected and reviewed continuously across the system's lifetime, not just at launch.
The report is itself an EVE Proof artifact — the same canonicalize → hash → sign pattern behind our Governed Decision Certificates. Your audit team (or a notified body) verifies it offline against the published public key, with no shared secret and no trust in EVE.
This pilot assesses an organisation's readiness to produce and present the evidence Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 requires. It is not legal advice, not a conformity assessment, and not CE marking, and it does not guarantee compliance. Framework mappings describe technical control support and evidence capabilities. Consult qualified counsel and, where required, a notified body. Cryptographic signing is ECDSA P-384 in hosted production.