Deterministic
AI Governance
Probabilistic guardrails tell you an action is probably fine. Regulated industries can't run on "probably." Deterministic governance enforces policy with reproducible logic and leaves a record an examiner can verify — the same verdict, every time, with proof of why.
EU AI Act · SR 26-2 · HIPAA · ECOA · NIST AI RMF
same out
The case for deterministic governance
Each topic has its own page — start anywhere.
What Deterministic Means →
Rule-based, reproducible, accountable enforcement — a control, not a suggestion.
Why Probabilistic Fails →
The questions an examiner asks that a classifier score can't answer.
Regulatory Mappings →
EU AI Act, SR 26-2, HIPAA, ECOA, NIST AI RMF — obligation to control.
Governance Principles →
The five commitments every EVE product is built to satisfy.
Articles & Research →
Long-form thinking on enforceable, provable AI governance.
Academy & Research →
Training as signed evidence, plus the patent portfolio behind it.
Governance you can import
Enforce policy and independently verify the resulting evidence from your own code. Published on PyPI and npm.
# pip install eve-coreguard from eve_coreguard import CoreGuardClient client = CoreGuardClient(api_key="eve_sk_…") result = client.evaluate( tenant_id="org_acme", proposed_action={"type": "diagnostic_conclusion"}, policy_set="healthcare_v1", ) print(result.verdict) # ALLOWED | BLOCKED | MODIFIED
# standalone verifier imports NOTHING from EVE — just: pip install cryptography # confirm a signed decision with EVE's PUBLIC key — no shared secret, no vendor $ python verify_eve_decision.py proof.json --pubkey eve-pubkey.pem ✓ VERIFIED # ECDSA P-384 key published at /.well-known/eve-pubkey
Book a Governance Assessment
A working session mapping your highest-risk AI workflows to deterministic controls and the evidence your examiners will ask for.