Enterprise Security

Security & Compliance

How EVE AI Core protects your AI infrastructure. Deterministic governance enforcement, cryptographic audit trails, and zero-trust architecture designed for the most demanding enterprise environments.

Report vulnerabilities: [email protected]
🔒
SOC 2 Type II Audit in progress — Decrypt CPA via Scytale
🛡
ISO 27001 Planned
21/21 Internal Red-Team
📜
93 Provisionals U.S. Filed

Control assurance status

What is deployed today versus in progress or on the roadmap. EVE is pre-general-availability; controls marked Production or Implemented are deployed and internally tested but have not yet been independently validated by a third party.

ControlStatusDeploymentEvidenceIndependent validation
Deterministic pre-execution decisions (CoreGuard)ProductionHosted APIPOST /v1/decisions/evaluateNot yet
ECDSA P-384-signed decision evidence + offline public-key verificationProductionHosted/verify · /.well-known/eve-pubkeyNot yet
JWT authentication (RS256; none algorithm rejected)ProductionHostedAsymmetric signing + per-IP/account rate limitingNot yet
Per-tenant isolation (authenticated org scoping)ProductionHostedAuth-derived tenant; DB row-level isolation opt-inNot yet
Deterministic prompt-injection / exfiltration screensProductionHostedInline screens at the prompt-firewall stageNot yet
Encryption at rest (AES-256-GCM, per-tenant keys)ImplementedHostedHierarchical key derivation; 90-day rotationNot yet
Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3; internal mTLS on roadmap)ImplementedHostedForward secrecy; restricted cipher suitesNot yet
Hash-chained signed audit trail + signed GDPR deletion receiptsImplementedHostedChain verification; signed deletion receiptsNot yet
Opt-in red-team assurance harness (deterministic verdicts, signed reports)Preview · off by defaultHosted (feature-flagged)core/assurance (EVE_ASSURANCE_LAB)Internal only
SOC 2 Type IIIn progressContinuous-evidence tooling; report not yet issuedIndependent audit engaged — Decrypt CPA (AICPA firm) via the Scytale platform
ISO 27001Planned
Independent penetration testPlannedScope defined; not yet runThird-party (planned)
Hardware root of trust / FPGA veto coreRoadmapveto_interface.h C contract; pure veto_core
Production Deployed and serving traffic. Implemented Built and internally tested; running in the hosted service. Preview / In progress Feature-flagged or under active build; not yet general. Planned / Roadmap Scoped but not yet built or run. Independent validation — “Not yet” means no third party has validated the control. When SOC 2 Type II and an external penetration test complete, this matrix cites the report and date.

Pre-GA disclosure. No control above has yet been independently validated by a third party. SOC 2 Type II (independent auditor Decrypt CPA, via the Scytale platform) and an independent black-box penetration test are in progress; this matrix will cite the report and completion date when each is available. Deployment scope refers to EVE's hosted service; self-hosted and VPC deployments vary by contract.

🔐

Data ProtectionImplemented

AES-256 encryption at rest TLS 1.3 in transit Detected PII redacted pre-log

Encryption at Rest

All stored data is encrypted with AES-256-GCM using per-tenant keys derived from a hierarchical key derivation scheme. Database volumes, backup snapshots, and privacy vault entries use independent encryption contexts. Key-rotation policy targets a 90-day rotation cycle.

Encryption in Transit

All network communication enforces TLS 1.3 with forward secrecy. Internal service-to-service authentication is enforced at the application layer; mutual TLS between internal services is on the hardening roadmap. Cipher suites are restricted to TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 and TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256.

PII Handling

A PII-redaction stage operates inline at the prompt-firewall stage, removing detected personally identifiable information before data reaches the LLM or logging infrastructure.

Redaction Map

The PII redaction map that tracks entity-to-token substitutions exists only in process memory for the duration of a single request. It is never persisted to disk, cached, or transmitted to external services. On request completion, the map is zeroed and deallocated.

Privacy vault entries use PBKDF2 key derivation (600,000 iterations) with AES-256-GCM for user-controlled encrypted data storage with configurable retention policies.
🔑

Access ControlProduction

JWT authentication Role-based access (5 roles) Scoped API keys

Authentication

JWT-based authentication with configurable expiration, refresh token rotation, and automatic session invalidation. Tokens are signed with an asymmetric key (RS256 in production) and validated on every request; the none algorithm is rejected. Failed authentication attempts are rate-limited per IP and per account.

Role-Based Access Control

Five hierarchical roles with granular permissions: Viewer, Operator, Approver, Admin, and Platform Admin. Nine permission scopes enforce tenant isolation. All permission checks are evaluated server-side before action dispatch.

API Key Scoping

API keys are scoped to specific capabilities (sovereign, read, write, admin). Keys are stored as irreversible SHA-256 hashes; the plaintext secret is returned exactly once at creation and never stored. Keys can be deactivated immediately.

Session Management

Active session tracking across devices with remote revocation capability. Device fingerprinting, IP tracking, and last-activity timestamps. Users can revoke all sessions or individual devices. Sessions auto-expire based on configurable inactivity timeouts.

🏗

InfrastructureImplemented

FPGA-compilable veto core (PolarFire SoC target) Three-Layer Trust Infrastructure Full tenant isolation

Hardware Enforcement

The safety-critical veto core is a pure deterministic function with zero I/O, zero threading, and zero global state -- computable by embedded firmware and suitable for compilation to Microchip PolarFire SoC FPGA. Today charter rules, cognitive locks, and drift budgets are enforced by this deterministic software core; FPGA/silicon enforcement is on the roadmap.

Three-Layer Trust Infrastructure

Service isolation between the Pre-Execution Authority Resolution Layer (authority pack evaluation), Governed Inference Layer (LLM inference and action dispatch), and Cryptographic Authority Chain Layer (authority record storage) — separate processes with independent state stores, authenticated interfaces, and one-way enforcement authority: the Authority Resolution Layer can halt the Inference Layer, but never the reverse. Physical/hardware isolation is a roadmap item (see the FPGA veto core).

Tenant Isolation

Each organization receives fully isolated governance instances: separate Charter, Claims Ledger, Trust Dial, Action Registry, and Reality Anchor. Tenant state is isolated per organization and enforced by server-side authorization on every request. LRU eviction with disk persistence ensures horizontal scalability.

Zero-Trust Internals

Internal services authenticate before trust is granted; no service trusts another by default. The veto core runs as a pure, deterministic function (suitable for formal verification). 15 immutable charter rules and 5 ethical red lines are frozen constants that cannot be modified at runtime.

The hardware veto core firmware API is defined in a 401-line C header (veto_interface.h) and validated by 87 determinism, equivalence, and purity tests.
📓

Audit & LoggingImplemented

Hash-chained JSONL logs ECDSA P-384-signed certificates 7+ year retention

Append-Only Logs

All governance decisions, charter checks, veto events, and operator actions are recorded in append-only JSONL files with SHA-256 hash chaining. Each entry contains the hash of the previous entry, so any retroactive alteration breaks the chain and is immediately detectable when records are re-verified against the signed certificates and externally retained checkpoints.

Cryptographic Attestations

Production governed-decision certificates are ECDSA P-384-signed and verifiable offline with EVE's public key — no access to EVE's internal state required. Self-hosted SDK deployments and resilience certificates may use HMAC-SHA256, which requires the shared secret to verify. Each certificate includes a content hash, signature, and timestamp for auditor verification.

Signing-Key Custody

The ECDSA P-384 private key that signs production governed-decision certificates is held by the signer and is never distributed — only its public half is published (at /.well-known/eve-pubkey), so an auditor verifies a record with the public key alone, needing no shared secret and no trust in EVE's systems. Governance audit-chain attestations are additionally signed with an asymmetric key managed by AWS KMS, whose private key never leaves the KMS boundary.

Retention & Compliance

Audit trails are retained for a minimum of 7 years to satisfy financial services, healthcare, and regulatory compliance requirements. The tamper-evident, hash-chained ledger layer uses PostgreSQL with write-ahead logging for crash recovery.

Governance Replay

Historical replay re-evaluates a decision against the exact policy version that governed it at the time (bound in its certificate); comparative replay re-runs the original inputs against a newer policy version to surface changed outcomes. Cross-system audit trails support correlation ID tracing across service boundaries. Export capabilities include CSV and JSON for external compliance tooling.

✓ Hash chain integrity verified continuously
governed decision · signed evidence record ✓ VERIFIED
decision_idDEC-00042
policylending_v1 · ECOA / Reg B
verdictBLOCK — adverse-action evidence required
content_hashsha256:3204f3d6…1ef0f3130
signaturekms-ecdsa-p384-3066…d914b8
Sample record · re-hash + ECDSA P-384 re-verify, no EVE service required Verify a record offline →

Runtime Governance & Adversarial HardeningProduction

Service gated by EVE’s own pipeline Continuous adversarial testing Signed, replayable decision records

The service governs itself

The EVE AI Core service runs behind the same pre-execution governance pipeline we sell: every action is evaluated against a versioned policy before it can take effect, and each decision produces a signed, hash-chained record. This is a control that protects the service — not just a product feature.

Continuous adversarial testing

The governance pipeline is adversarially tested on an ongoing basis, and findings are converted into regression tests so that closed attack classes stay closed. Coverage is summarized in each resilience certificate.

Full capability documentation

The enforcement capabilities themselves — policy packs, deterministic verdicts, CRD scoring, decision certificates, and adversarial benchmarks — are documented on the product pages: EVE CoreGuard, EVE Governance, and the benchmark report.

This page documents controls that protect the EVE AI Core service. For the enforcement product’s full feature set, see the product pages linked above.
📋

Compliance FrameworksMapping · not certified

EU AI Act readiness NIST AI RMF alignment ISO/IEC 42001 mapping

EU AI Act

EVE's governance architecture maps directly to EU AI Act requirements for high-risk AI systems: risk management (Article 9), data governance (Article 10), transparency and information provision (Article 13), human oversight (Article 14), and accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity (Article 15).

NIST AI RMF

Aligned with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework across all four functions: Govern (charter-based policy), Map (risk classification and CRD scoring), Measure (resilience scoring and calibration), and Manage (human-in-the-loop escalation and remediation).

ISO/IEC 42001

Architecture and operational procedures map to ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System requirements. The governance pipeline, audit trail, and bounded change-control provide auditable evidence for certification readiness.

Automated Compliance Reports

Generate on-demand compliance reports that map EVE's governance controls to specific regulatory articles and framework requirements. Reports include evidence chains, attestation references, and coverage analysis for audit preparation.

Compliance mapping documents are available under NDA. Contact [email protected] for access to detailed framework alignment reports.

Incident ResponseImplemented

Webhook alerts (Slack/Teams/PagerDuty) Circuit breaker auto-recovery Human-in-the-loop escalation

Real-Time Alerting

21 webhook event types deliver governance notifications to your existing incident management stack. Native integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and PagerDuty. Events include charter vetoes, trust violations, drift alerts, explosion indicators, and emergency shutdowns.

Circuit Breaker Recovery

Per-provider and per-service circuit breakers automatically isolate failing components. States progress through closed (healthy), open (blocked), and half_open (testing recovery). Exponential backoff prevents cascade failures. The system fails safe -- degraded mode preserves governance integrity.

Human Escalation

10 escalation triggers monitor for conditions requiring human judgment: emotional volatility, high uncertainty, ethical ambiguity, identity threats, and conflicting directives. Escalations include urgency levels, recommended pause actions, and context packages for rapid human decision-making.

Emergency Shutdown

Multi-layer operator emergency stop. Bounded change-control continuously monitors governance health indicators and halts automatically if critical thresholds are crossed, with full rollback protection. Manual emergency stop is available to any authorized operator at any time.

Intellectual Property Protection

93 U.S. provisional patent applications filed and pending, with additional invention disclosures under review, covering the Three-Layer Trust Infrastructure, CRD scoring, FPGA-targetable veto design, and deterministic governance enforcement. Single-owner IP with no license fragmentation. Serial numbers 63/988,235 through 64/114,718.

Ready to evaluate EVE AI Core?

Our security team is available to walk through architecture details, compliance mappings, and deployment options for your environment.

Direct line: [email protected]